5 Answers

• Reputation: 1 Q&A: 0 0 0 1 0 0 Classifieds: 0 0 what's this? Follow Following 0

  0 0 she was 5 foot 5.5, and her weight varied dramatically (when she died she was 118 lbs, so if you look at her last photo shoot, that should give you a baseline for comparison). like everybody's saying, sizing has changed a lot (and is inconsistent f. brand to brand) so i don't think the size thing means anything. also, even at the start of her career she was considered a little chubby, but sexy (according to Emmeline Snively, her first modeling agent)(though honestly, I can't see why. i'm an ex-anorectic, crazy, hypercritical bitch about body fat, and I think she was HOT, always.) impossibleprincess answered in Style & Beauty about 1 year ago | Report 1 comment by jkkenny6… 0 0 i read that her dressmaker said she was a 32D...that she had a most slender back, which made her breasts appear very large. She had a tiny waist, 22-24 to match, with 35-36 hips. it was the very narrow chest that kept many women from being able to fit into her size clothing (32D unusual back then?) jkkenny6 commented about 1 year ago | Report Enter your comment or ask a new question preview THIS IS A PREVIEW: Click "Post" to submit it or "Edit" to make changes. edit Please wait… This could take a minute if the tubes are clogged.

  Share this answer with a friend:

• Reputation: 650 Q&A: 14 0 3 360 50 0 Classifieds: 0 0 what's this? Follow Following 0

  0 0 She had what would be considered today a rather large derriere (check it out in Some like It Hot or The Prince and the Showgirl). She needed a size 12, but with today's vanity sizing, that's probably a size 8 or 10 today. It all changed after Twiggy, of course, but before then, fashionable women (Audrey Hepburn notwithstanding) could have curves - in short, knockers and an ass...not an enormous ass, but definitely some meat back there. Even high fashion models like Suzy Parker, while thin, was a little voluptuous. Bauhaus answered in Style & Beauty about 1 year ago | Report Comment on this answer Enter your comment or ask a new question preview THIS IS A PREVIEW: Click "Post" to submit it or "Edit" to make changes. edit Please wait… This could take a minute if the tubes are clogged.

  Share this answer with a friend:

• Reputation: -7 Q&A: 0 0 0 0 7 0 Classifieds: 0 0 what's this? Follow Following 0 kuuipo61

  0 6 Yes - I've read it estimated higher, but she was at least a 10. I read a book by one of her photographers that discussed this size issue.(Can't think of who... sorry). But, sizes were different back then. Size 6 was a string bean like Audrey Hepburn maybe or Katherin Hepburn who was in between the other two? Marilyn was indeed larger than women are allowed to be today, but she was gorgeously full figured. All of the pinups were back then. I'd bet Selma Hyack (sp) is similar though not as big (not allowed to be). Katy Perry is full figured too although a little leaner than Marilyn, and I've heard people call her FAT!! She looks perfect and is obviously toned. Insane. Side note for comparison. Personally, I've gone from a six 6 to a 2-4 and haven't changed weight or size one iota. I'm a string been pretty. I even got stressed-out one time and lost some weight and hit a 0. A ZERO! That's insanity - I'm 5'8" tall with broad shoulders so even if I am skinny, I would never, EVER be a zero in Marilyn's day. kuuipo61 answered in Style & Beauty about 1 year ago | Report Comment on this answer Enter your comment or ask a new question preview THIS IS A PREVIEW: Click "Post" to submit it or "Edit" to make changes. edit Please wait… This could take a minute if the tubes are clogged.

  Share this answer with a friend:

• Reputation: 1813 Q&A: 22 0 42 1410 992 23 Classifieds: 0 0 what's this? Follow Following 3

  1 3 Sorry, but you need to find a good biography of Marilyn, quick! Marilyn was found in the nude in 1962, not 1952. O my captain answered in Style & Beauty about 1 year ago | Report Comment on this answer Enter your comment or ask a new question preview THIS IS A PREVIEW: Click "Post" to submit it or "Edit" to make changes. edit Please wait… This could take a minute if the tubes are clogged.

  Share this answer with a friend:

• Reputation: 108 Q&A: 0 0 5 9 1 0 Classifieds: 0 0 what's this? Follow Following 0

  5 0 The size thing is pretty hard to pin down, since as you mentioned sizing has changed quite a bit over time and varies dramatically by country, designer, manufacturer, etc. According to measurements from Marilyn Monroe's dressmaker: Height: 5 feet, 5½ inches Weight: 118-140 pounds Bust: 35-37 inches Waist: 22-23 inches Hips: 35-36 inches Bra size: 36D (published several places. I found it at: http://jezebel.com/5299793/for-the-last-time-what-size-was-marilyn-monroe#ixzz0vBl0a4zJ) Which would mean she would probably buy a modern ready-to-wear size 4-6 and would need to have it tailored significantly to nip in at the waist. Megan answered in Style & Beauty about 1 year ago | Report 4 comments by K Lo, Fnarf, and cd… 0 0 That's what I suspected. :) It's tough for me to translate measurements into proportions. Thanks! K Lo commented about 1 year ago | Report 0 0 I was just about to post this same link. The article it mentions, http://women.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/women/fashion/article6044724.ece, is a fascinating read as well -- the woman who wrote is pretty authoritative, since she actually tried to try on Marilyn's clothes. The reason there's so much confusion and mythology about her size is because her body was extremely unusual -- her back was very tiny and narrow, but she had huge boobs -- in today's (English) terms, a 30E. She wasn't "full-figured" in the usual sense, or a Joan Holloway from Mad Men sense, because her waist was so small. Fnarf commented about 1 year ago | Report 0 0 I'd say it's closer to a 2 or 4. Though I can't believe anyone with a bmi of 21 (as the article Fnarf linked states) could be considered chubby. cd commented about 1 year ago | Report 0 0 Extreme hourglass. What an extraordinary shape. Thanks for the Jezebel link; that's a good write-up. I especially like the consideration that the clothes were cut smaller at the time not only because of smaller bodies, but because of the serious girdling. That's not mentioned as often. Gloria commented about 1 year ago | Report Enter your comment or ask a new question preview THIS IS A PREVIEW: Click "Post" to submit it or "Edit" to make changes. edit Please wait… This could take a minute if the tubes are clogged.

  Share this answer with a friend: