3 Answers

• Reputation: 844 Q&A: 14 0 7 466 47 1 Classifieds: 0 0 what's this? Follow Following 2

  4 1 I do not accept the premise of your question... ozchick answered in Whatever about 1 year ago | Report Comment on this answer Enter your comment or ask a new question preview THIS IS A PREVIEW: Click "Post" to submit it or "Edit" to make changes. edit Please wait… This could take a minute if the tubes are clogged.

  Share this answer with a friend:

• Reputation: 3723 Q&A: 109 0 27 1716 713 0 Classifieds: 0 0 what's this? Follow Following 1

  1 1 I know several reasons why it may become iconic, ...and they've nothing to do with Shatner's toupee ;) Rev.Enant answered in Whatever about 1 year ago | Report 2 comments by Cato the Younger Younger and Rev.Enant… 0 0 It was actually about Patrick Stewart Cato the Younger Younger commented about 1 year ago | Report 0 0 Yes, I was riffing off your odd non-sequitor between Gene's comment about Sir Patrick Stewart's pate, and the reboot ST (which also included plenty of bald/balding people). i.e. WTF. i.e. I also do not accept the premise of your 'Q'. Rev.Enant commented about 1 year ago | Report Enter your comment or ask a new question preview THIS IS A PREVIEW: Click "Post" to submit it or "Edit" to make changes. edit Please wait… This could take a minute if the tubes are clogged.

  Share this answer with a friend:

• Reputation: 733 Q&A: 22 0 4 224 16 1 Classifieds: 0 0 what's this? Follow Following 0

  1 1 What is this...Rhetorical-Questionland? Danger answered in Whatever about 1 year ago | Report Comment on this answer Enter your comment or ask a new question preview THIS IS A PREVIEW: Click "Post" to submit it or "Edit" to make changes. edit Please wait… This could take a minute if the tubes are clogged.

  Share this answer with a friend: