41367_712392177_3476_n_small
Reputation: 1

Do you think it is appropriate for people to be judged based on their writing

Answer this question or share it with a smart friend:

Avatar_default
Type your answer here…

12 Answers

  • Image00666_small
    Reputation: 3564

    You forgot to punctuate.

    Share this answer with a friend:
  • Skull_pumpkin_small
    Reputation: 1610

    It's inevitable when you're communicating in writing. What else have people to judge you by?

    Share this answer with a friend:
  • Words_small
    Reputation: 755

    Handwriting or composition skills? I'll assume the latter.

    Appropriate or not, it happens.

    In a professional or academic environment, I think it's 100% acceptable. For instance: office communications, resumes, newspaper articles, press releases, academic papers, communications to customers and clients, etc. (incomplete sentence, I know!)

    In a more casual environment, such as Questionland, you only have the content of what people say and how they say it to get to know a person. This makes it inevitable that people will form an picture of you based solely on those two items. I would conjecture that judging to some extent is unavoidable.

    However, sometimes really intelligent people are horrible writers, and some really dim-witted people can write quite well, but the content is mind-numbingly idiotic.

    I would always err on the side of trying to write well, unless you are limited by characters in a very casual environment, such as texting or tweeting. If you are referring to a situation in a working environment, it never hurts to have someone else proofread for you.

    Share this answer with a friend:
  • Cat-duck-2_small
    Reputation: 1560

    If your interactions with someone involve you reading what they write, then part of your overall opinion of them will be informed by the quality of their writing. It's certainly got nothing to do with being good in bed, for instance, or being financially wise or a good conflict mediator.

    Basically, it depends on why you're judging them in the first place.

    Share this answer with a friend:
  • Veronica-lake-by-rosejuvenal_small
    Reputation: 480

    I'd say sometimes it is, and sometimes it isn't. It's definitely appropriate if that's all you've got to go on. If you're going through a stack of resumes, it's perfectly appropriate to reject the sloppy ones, because they're direct evidence that those people do not put a lot of care into their work. If you meet someone online who uses overblown language, it's fair to judge them as self-absorbed and pretentious. The quality of someone's writing says a lot about the quality of their mind and personality.

    That doesn't mean it's always fair, though. The more evidence you can gather about a person, the better quality judgement you'll make. Plenty of people are gifted in other ways -- they have talent, or emotional intelligence, or they're persuasive talkers, or they're funny. Some people are beautiful and present themselves really well, and that can work for them. It all depends on what they're trying to achieve.

    But ultimately, I'd say this: much of our communication today, social and professional, is in writing, and you ARE being judged by it, whether you like it or not. If you communicate clearly, you'll get more respect. I can't think of a better reason to take the extra care to get it right.

    Share this answer with a friend:
  • Profile_small
    Reputation: 371

    I make exceptions for people with dyslexia or similar learning abilities (my dad and brother struggled with it), and I understand people can have plenty of good qualities even if they can't write well...

    But I have very little tolerance for someone who doesn't take the two-seconds needed to proof-read for basic spelling and grammar, even in casual situations (twitter, comments, etc). In a professional capacity, it's completely unacceptable. I consider it almost disrespectful to the people you're addressing, and yourself.

    You don't have to follow the AP Style Guide for every email to your mom, but yes, I absolutely judge someone poorly if they don't/can't take the time to coherently express their thoughts.

    Share this answer with a friend:
  • Lookalikes_small
    Reputation: 2589

    In what context? If it's on a resume, you bet your behind I'm going to judge people based on their attention to details such as spelling, punctuation, etc. If it's an IM, I don't much care so long as I can puzzle out what on earth they're trying to say. It's all about the context. If you cannot clearly communicate what you are trying to say, then your writing needs improvement. If, on the other hand, your target audience understands your meaning without difficulty, then you're writing appropriately.

    Share this answer with a friend:
  • N871065272_8115_small
    Reputation: 959

    I love good writing and think grammar is fascinating, but we use grammar and spelling standards to enforce class distinctions. It takes years of education just to learn the rules of English grammar, and years more to learn how to write well. If you don't go to a good school, if you don't hear standard English spoken at home, and if the adults around you have decided you have only blue-collar jobs in your future, it's going to be harder to learn good writing skills.

    However, writing isn't just about grammar. It's also about how you organize ideas and communicate. For most white-collar jobs, this is important. It seems fair to evaluate job candidates' writing abilities.

    All this assumes that you're talking about writing, not handwriting. Some companies have used "graphologists" to analyze job candidates' handwriting samples. This is the worst kind of junk science BS.

    Share this answer with a friend:
  • 2008_0522stuff0016_small
    Reputation: 2052

    One wouldn't want a copy editor who is unfamiliar with grammatical and spelling errors, would one?

    Taking care in one's writing conveys that effort was made to ensure clear, thoughtful communication. Dashing off a text ful fo spleling erors makes the writer seem juvenile at best.

    Share this answer with a friend:
  • Meeeeee_small
    Reputation: 0

    Judging what? A person's knowledge/skills? I have seen many kids who score A+ failing to differntiate between lose/loose, your/you're and so on. I am not good at grammar either. I get confused with punctuations. Now coming to the writing part, no I don't think it would be appropriate for people to judge based on writing. Doctors, anyone?

    Share this answer with a friend:
  • Rick010_small
    Reputation: 22

    I would only say I think it's easy to be *misjudged* based on your writings which is a problem especially in our day-to-day emails and text messages, whether personal or business.

    With it's obvious advantages there is also the disadvantage of your writings being taken the wrong way by the reader, without the accompanying facial expressions and voice tones to go along with them.

    I've learned that even if words to the contrary are staring the reader in the face, you can still be inappropriately judged.

    All this, despite the power of the written word. Go figure!

    Share this answer with a friend:
  • Sacri_ordines_by_charism_small
    Reputation: 3723

    For hiring purposes? Yes, of course.

    Cover letters, application essays and well-designed resumes are appropriate gatekeeper tools in ANY vocation where communication is key to success.

    Factory line assembly worker in a plant with only one person? No. No, that's out of line.

    Share this answer with a friend: