7 Answers

• Reputation: 517 Q&A: 5 0 15 814 697 0 Classifieds: 0 0 what's this? Follow Following 0

  1 1 Seattle should aspire to be the porn capital of the world!!! Cato the Younger Younger answered in Filmmaking Week about 1 year ago | Report 1 comment by Rev.Enant… 0 0 Indie Pr0n Rev.Enant commented about 1 year ago | Report Enter your comment or ask a new question New comments are not being accepted at this time.

  Share this answer with a friend:

• Reputation: 69 Q&A: 0 0 2 38 9 0 Classifieds: 0 0 what's this? Expert: 3 topics Filmmaking Week Genius Awards Week SIFF Follow Following 0

  1 1 The problem, I think, is we do not make films for local consumption. we make films to make it elsewhere. an idie film made here is really for new york city. that is our actual market. something special might happen if we did make films for seattle. for its consumption and self-reflection. charles mudede answered in Filmmaking Week about 1 year ago | Report 1 comment by clint… 0 0 I feel that there are many filmmakers who make films for audiences here, but with a few exceptions they are mostly ignored in favor of films from outside of this area. Currently, the best way for a local filmmaker to be taken seriously is to first have success outside of Seattle. That seems a bit messed up to me. Shouldn't we be championing more films from our own talent pool? clint commented about 1 year ago | Report Enter your comment or ask a new question New comments are not being accepted at this time.

  Share this answer with a friend:

• Reputation: 3 Q&A: 0 0 0 8 5 0 Classifieds: 0 0 what's this? Expert: 1 topic Filmmaking Week Follow Following 0

  1 1 The Seattle indie model is outstanding and we do it as well as any other American city. I hope we can continue to have both smaller and larger films. For many of us film work is our day job and sadly the indies don't pay our bills. I'd rather more big films came here as I'm sick of working out of town. Jennifer Roth answered in Filmmaking Week about 1 year ago | Report Comment on this answer Enter your comment or ask a new question New comments are not being accepted at this time.

  Share this answer with a friend:

• Reputation: 3723 Q&A: 109 0 27 1716 713 0 Classifieds: 0 0 what's this? Follow Following 1

  0 0 For the immediate future: One with great cinemas, varied festivals and world-class art schools. In my humble opinion, we only need to work on the art school part. Long term: I appreciate your dream / desire to be an indie mecca. I just don't see the economics nor the fundamentals in place to make it happen more than it has already. Rev.Enant answered in Filmmaking Week about 1 year ago | Report Comment on this answer Enter your comment or ask a new question New comments are not being accepted at this time.

  Share this answer with a friend:

• Reputation: 46 Q&A: 2 0 0 8 2 0 Classifieds: 0 0 what's this? Expert: 1 topic Filmmaking Week Follow Following 0

  0 1 Craig, these larger films coming into town are absolutely relevant to to the work you do. they are the ones largely making it possible for crews to make movies for a living, and ultimately to bring professional work and experience to the smaller films. My problem with a micro-budget "indie mecca" is that it's not a sustainable model for crews to support themselves and their families. They work a couple freebee shows and end up getting full time jobs or moving to cities where they can make a living. Indie films need to be rejuvenating the communities they occupy and replenishing the resources they use: by paying decent rates to vendors, locations, crew and actors. Grassroots was a small indie film, but it gave back. Making a film for $30K is great (I've done it), but it won't keep food on the table, and you'll eventually loose the resources you depend on. Sean Porter answered in Filmmaking Week about 1 year ago | Report 1 comment by Craig Packard… 0 0 There doesn't appear to be a way to respond to all, so I'll respond the the latest. Thanks for all the good stuff to think about. It's a conversation worth having. Part of what I'm saying is that people who want LA or NY shouldn't look here. They already exist and you can go there if you wish. I've lived in LA... I think it is possible to make a $50K movie sustainable because the threshold for return is so much lower, and there are fewer crew needs. And crew working at that level know that they aren't going to support their families with film work, just as so many other artists in other fields have their day jobs. There's also nothing wrong with making a "small" film with the aspirations of making "bigger" films in the future, but if you're just doing something as a stepping stone, its unlikely the work will be great. Flashy, maybe. Part of the reason there's no local film scene worth the name is that no one in the local press (with a few exceptions) has been talking about it. That's part of what I mean about letting the tail wag the dog. I don't think SIFF should be bigger, though. It's a friggin' bloated behemoth. Better, probably and more fun, certainly. Craig Packard commented about 1 year ago | Report Enter your comment or ask a new question New comments are not being accepted at this time.

  Share this answer with a friend:

• Reputation: 4 Q&A: 0 0 0 10 6 0 Classifieds: 0 0 what's this? Expert: 1 topic Filmmaking Week Follow Following 0

  0 1 Lynn is absolutely the model. But still she is stepping onto an elevator (financially)... to elsewhere. There needs to be a culture change around funding films: there are what, 50,000 millionaires here? Where is the money for local film? Unfortunately noblesse oblige seems to be strictly an East coast phenomenon. Honest to God I don't know how to make it happen. Megan Griffiths scrapes for years to get The Off Hours off the ground, Linas Phillips has to move away, Dan Gildark makes a feature with theatrical distro and can't pull together money for a much smaller second one - WTF? The people that fund opera and ballet and SAM are complete strangers to local film. The party needs to get much bigger (SIFF needs to be more FUN). And Seattle needs to stop looking to NY and LA for validation, because until it does, that will be exclusively where the money is and the brain drain will continue. Grant Cogswell answered in Filmmaking Week about 1 year ago | Report Comment on this answer Enter your comment or ask a new question New comments are not being accepted at this time.

  Share this answer with a friend:

• Reputation: 5 Q&A: 0 0 0 6 1 0 Classifieds: 0 0 what's this? Expert: 1 topic Filmmaking Week Follow Following 0

  0 1 I think your question is a rather complicated one because many of the local filmmakers use the paycheck from the Hollywood films that come through to pay their bills and fund their projects. Its a system that is frustrating for all the reasons you point out and for as Charles said earlier to another post, because there isn't much capital in Seattle to help fund local work. That being said, I think we could rethink "local work" to reflect a sustainable filmmaking culture. On in which projects have shorter production time frames and smaller budgets, but still aim to pay their crews. I also think Charles idea is interesting, but would point out that there's a fair amount of indie film made for local consumption, many of which you'll find in our Local Sightings Festival every October. Either way I'm curious to hear what others think about this as well. Adam Sekuler answered in Filmmaking Week about 1 year ago | Report Comment on this answer Enter your comment or ask a new question New comments are not being accepted at this time.

  Share this answer with a friend: