Cedar_photo_small
Reputation: 1506

What have your experiences been with the new TSA scanners/pat down?

Did you go for the scan? Or did you opt out and go for the pat down? Just how invasive is the pat down? Do you think we should be worried about the levels of radiation in the scanners?

Answer this question or share it with a smart friend:

Avatar_default
Type your answer here…

Asker's Favorite

  • Sacri_ordines_by_charism_small
    Reputation: 3723

    My 4th Amendment rights demand that I opt way the fawk out

    "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

    Share this answer with a friend:

5 Other Answers

  • Img_0816_small
    Reputation: 97

    I plan on popping a viagra before they snap a porn pic or feel me up.

    Share this answer with a friend:
  • N871065272_8115_small
    Reputation: 959

    I went through the scan at Seatac last Sunday. The images are sent to a central office, not to the TSA officers in the security area. For some reason, the central office lost my images (or decided I needed further screening) so I was also subject to the pat down. The Seatac TSA people were perfectly nice and professional, but I made it clear I wasn't happy with either the scanner or the pat down.

    Share this answer with a friend:
  • 1061873134_seconddoc_small
    Reputation: 276

    I would be more worried about the fact the "porno-scanners" were rejected by the air port in Tel Aviv airport (which claims to be the safest in the world) as being ineffective in detecting explosives. (Seriously, search that on the internet and it was on Democracy Now two weeks ago; the archive is on their website)

    So the choice comes down to a groping that is as uncomfortable as that night Turlough got drunk and decided to do a rough feel up on me (I taught him a lesson after that!) or the possibility of your naked picture being saved for prosperity in some pervert TSA's employee's computer. Both choices really aren't choices at all.

    But I went with the scanner at ORD: There were no hot TSA screeners around. If the TSA employees were hotter than I'd go with the groping...maybe.

    Share this answer with a friend:
  • Doorbells_002_small
    Reputation: 896

    Though I haven't had an experience with the scanners yet, I continual joke that I'm going to glue tin foil letters on my belly saying "Nothing down here, folks!"

    My wife swears I'll get strip searched for my trouble...

    Share this answer with a friend:
  • Botero100_small
    Reputation: 395

    Flew to SF and back a couple of weeks ago and went through the scanners both ways. Didn't really think much about it. If some TSA drone in a room somewhere, looking at hundreds of those weird, blurry images a day, gets a special thrill seeing mine, so what? And the statistics about how much radiation I got and now much of danger that is aren't real convincing, either. In the grand scheme of all the things I have to worry about, this is just a non-issue.

    Share this answer with a friend: