Avatar_default
Reputation: 41

What role will mandatory retirement of a WA Supreme Court Justice play in the legalization of gay marriage?

Chief Justice Gerry Alexander (who voted against gay marriage) is up for mandatory retirement in 2011. Gregoire will appoint a replacement, right? Does that mean the 5-4 court decision could switch to 4-5 if a new lawsuit happens?

Asker's Favorite

  • Xx_2011_murray_img_3052sm_small
    Reputation: 22

    It is unclear how the retirement of Justice Alexander will affect the outcome of a new marriage equality lawsuit. Remember, Justice Madsen was seen as a likely "yes" vote before she sided with the majority in striking down the last one. But it does stand to reason that the Governor would presumably chose a more progressive justice than Alexander in replacing him, which would give one hope that a new lawsuit would fare better before the court. Also, though Justice Sanders lost re-election, it is not a given that new Justice Wiggins is a "yes".

    Share this answer with a friend:

2 Other Answers

  • 12849517g_small
    Reputation: 475

    Legalization could also take place through the legislature; the current DOMA law in WA state is a law that the legislature could repeal if they wanted. After the WA Supreme Court ruling, as far as I understand it, the legislature is not required to recognize gay marriage, but is also not prohibited from recognizing it, as is the case in states that have DOMA constitutional amendments.

    Having the legislature repeal the DOMA would likely trigger a referendum similar to R-71 if that happened.

    With the way opinions are changing in this area - a majority of folks currently in favor - will be interesting to see which approach ends up happening first.

    Share this answer with a friend:
  • Tomato_small
    Reputation: 1045

    Remember that Justice Sanders, who also voted against gay marriage, was voted out in favor of Charlie Wiggins in the last election. So, with Judge Alexander's retirement, it is likely that an appointment by Gov. Gregoire will fall on the pro- side of the next gay marriage challenge, giving a possible six of nine votes on the good side. Of course, there will have to be another case challenging Washington's marriage laws, and such a case may be nuanced in such a way that these judges don't vote so predictably. But things are looking up for sure.

    Share this answer with a friend: