Gogogophers_small
Reputation: 864

Less hungry from whole grain carbs?

So the word from nutritionists and some doctors for a while now is that you get less hungry after eating whole grains. Apparently, it takes the stomach longer to digest or something, which, in turn, makes you want to eat less.

I'm calling bullshit.

Yeah. You're not eating empty calories, so it's got more nutrition than white breads (which have practically none). There's that irrefutable fact. but, otherwise:
Bull. Shit.

Has it truly been proven in an irrefutable scientific study that whole grains makes you significantly less hungry or is this possibly another nutrition false-fact that might be proven wrong in 10 years or so? If you've got a link to this proof, please share it.

I've been on whole grains for a year, and from a hunger perspective, I'm definitely not noticing a difference.

By the way, I put this in Science & Technology instead of Health & Fitness for a reason.

Edit: I didn't mean for this to come off as so aggressive. I just love saying "Bullshit".

Edit #2: I do know the difference between whole grains and whole wheat.

Answer this question or share it with a smart friend:

Avatar_default
Type your answer here…

Asker's Favorite

  • Bauhaus_small
    Reputation: 650

    The scientific explanation suggests that slowly digestible carbs (whole grains) don't spike insulin levels the way white flour, sugar, refined carbs, and fruit juices (and alcohol) do. Sugary Chinese food is notorious for satisfying hunger for about an hour and then you hit the leftovers. When insulin spikes, blood sugar decreases, and one then feels the need to eat again to get the blood sugar level back up starting the cycle all over again.

    But here's the thing...carbs are fairly calorie intensive and portion control must be exercised or you're going to gain weight. Personally speaking, if I get on a sandwich kick (even using whole grain, healthy bread), I find myself eating more and more frequently. Bread in all forms satisfies hunger but only temporarily. And I can eat a wheel barrel full of whole wheat pasta - enough of it until I'm sick-full, and two hours later I want another helping of spaghetti (or whatever).

    It may be genetic. I know runners, for instance, don't usually have to worry about carbs because they burn it off. But I have to avoid or limit carb intake or I balloon up in no time. It isn't that way for everyone, but it is definitely that way for me.

    And that USDA pyramid is well-known bullshit. Twelve servings (even half-cup servings) of grains a day? Can you say "wheat lobby?" I'd weight 500 lbs. if I followed its recommendations.

    Share this answer with a friend:

2 Other Answers

  • Icon_small
    Reputation: 1627

    I don't believe it either. My go-to breakfasts are an egg white omelet or oatmeal. On days that I have oatmeal, I'm *much* hungrier early in the day than when I have an omelet for breakfast. Oatmeal might not leave me as hungry as a slice of toast with jam would, but I think even a doughnut would be more filling.

    More and more, I'm becoming convinced that the low-fat, high-carb mantra of the past 30 years is partly responsible for our obesity epidemic.

    Share this answer with a friend:
  • Cats_small
    Reputation: 891

    It's all relative. I recently read an article somewhere where this guy was spotlighting that yes white flour is bad for you, but whole wheat is just less bad, so relative to white flour it's good.

    I'm becoming more and more interested in the paleo diet.

    Share this answer with a friend: