5 Answers

• Reputation: 307 Q&A: 6 0 1 191 24 0 Classifieds: 0 0 what's this? Follow Following 0 Billy in 4C

  8 2 My guess is that this is probably illegal, but there is enough room for interpretation that whoever is in charge of enforcing it would probably not want to deal with it. It is illegal to have two residences on a single piece of property zoned single-family residential. Two separate structures (if you can convince them that the RV is a structure) would constitute 2 single-family residences. Also, most cities have limit on the number of unrelated people living together that consistute a single "family". The addition of these lawn neighbors my put them over. If the primary residents are collecting rent, that seems like an obvious violation. Another way it could be illegal is if the addition of the RV creates an excessive amount of impervious area on the property. Most cities/counties have limits (typically a percentage of the total property size) on the allowable impervious area -- this is a result of stormwater implications of impervious areas. Obviously, an RV doesn't take up that much area, but urban residences often maximize the imperious percentage (since the parcels are generally small) and it my not take much to put them over the limit. Billy in 4C answered in Finance/Insure/Legal over 2 years ago | Report Comment on this answer Enter your comment or ask a new question preview THIS IS A PREVIEW: Click "Post" to submit it or "Edit" to make changes. edit Please wait… This could take a minute if the tubes are clogged.

  Share this answer with a friend:

• Reputation: 138 Q&A: 2 0 0 136 38 0 Classifieds: 0 0 what's this? Follow Following 0

  2 0 Would you feel differently if it was a nice RV? dwight moody answered in Finance/Insure/Legal over 2 years ago | Report Comment on this answer Enter your comment or ask a new question preview THIS IS A PREVIEW: Click "Post" to submit it or "Edit" to make changes. edit Please wait… This could take a minute if the tubes are clogged.

  Share this answer with a friend:

• Reputation: 1560 Q&A: 30 0 2 1153 233 0 Classifieds: 0 0 what's this? Follow Following 0

  4 2 I think this would depend on the specific zoning rules in effect on that specific block. Dramatically different for First Hill and Northgate. Lee answered in Finance/Insure/Legal over 2 years ago | Report Comment on this answer Enter your comment or ask a new question preview THIS IS A PREVIEW: Click "Post" to submit it or "Edit" to make changes. edit Please wait… This could take a minute if the tubes are clogged.

  Share this answer with a friend:

• Reputation: 55 Q&A: 0 0 0 75 20 0 Classifieds: 0 0 what's this? Follow Following 0

  1 2 Maybe maybe not, but if you tattle on them to the city and make them homeless just because you're annoyed, you suck as a person. Toasterhedgehog answered in Finance/Insure/Legal over 2 years ago | Report Comment on this answer Enter your comment or ask a new question preview THIS IS A PREVIEW: Click "Post" to submit it or "Edit" to make changes. edit Please wait… This could take a minute if the tubes are clogged.

  Share this answer with a friend:

• Reputation: 1962 Q&A: 32 0 1 1965 663 0 Classifieds: 0 0 what's this? Follow Following 2

  3 4 Maybe . elenchos answered in Finance/Insure/Legal over 2 years ago | Report Comment on this answer Enter your comment or ask a new question preview THIS IS A PREVIEW: Click "Post" to submit it or "Edit" to make changes. edit Please wait… This could take a minute if the tubes are clogged.

  Share this answer with a friend: