Ask Seattle A Question
Questions are no longer being accepted in this category. You can read previous questions and answers below.
School Lunch Revolution!
5434116137_4f9a00aafd_m

Where do school meal ingredients come from? How many and what kind of calories should a student eat at lunch? What can parents do to help Seattle Schools improve nutrition? Seattle Public School Nutrition Services Director Eric Boutin is becoming a leader in Seattle’s slow food movement and wants that to drive school foods. He knows kids nutrition for op...

Answers
  • There aren't any favorite answers in School Lunch Revolution!.
Questions
Recent Comments
  • Comment on SPS Nutrition Services's answer…
    Picture1_small

    Cindy,

    Thank you for your volunteer work at Lawton!

    I think we are all in agreement (you, me and likely the Kitchen Manager at Lawton and Kitchen Managers at all our schools) that ideally we'd have fully operating scratch cooking kitchens serving fresh, homemade breakfasts and lunches every day.

    As with pretty much every single school district across the nation, the economics simply do not support such an arrangement.

    That being said, our schools (including the pre-pack schools) offer good healthy choices every day. We continue to try to source local fruits and vegetables and our Central Kitchen really does a nice job of preparing some excellent homemade entrees. As noted in other posts, we are working on new "kid-tested" recipes focused on fresh "whole" foods. I do hope you will continue to see us evolve to offering fewer processed foods and a greater focus on food as nourishment. I especially hope that on these special menu days that you (and all parents) choose those days to encourage your child(ren) to participate!

    (re: pre-pack containers - the containers and films we use in our pre-pack schools do not contain BPA)

  • Comment on SPS Nutrition Services's answer…
    Avatar_default

    I volunteer at lunch at my daughter's elementary (Lawton)almost everyday and I am a dietitian. I find it sad to see their fully functional kitchen not being utilized. The hot food almost always comes out looking shriveled, overcooked and not fresh, homemade or healthy looking at all. Is there any way their kitchen can be used to prepare the children's meals? In addition I am concerned about the containers the hot food is heated in and have posted a question on this earlier.

  • Comment on protosaurus's answer…
    Candy_porn

    I was raised eating delicious, wholesome, nutritious vegetarian food, and all I wanted to do was eat processed food like my friends did. I was eating hamburgers, coke and other such junk as soon as I was able via my modest allowance and school lunches and vending machines.

    As my avatar makes clear, I like candy. But it is a pleasure like alcohol and drugs and sex to be enjoyed responsibly and judiciously. Of course children should be able to eat candy once in a while, but the way heavily processed crap is marketed and made available to children is disgusting. You want to rail against my hippy ass and then praise the federal government for giving massive farm subsidies to corn growers who flood the food supply with corn syrup and hydrogenated oils and isolated vegetable protein while small farmers attempting to practice self-reliance by producing delicious produce that people want and thrive on (fresh vegetables in season, fat and happy animals, etc.) face oppressive restrictions?

  • Comment on protosaurus's answer…
    Candy_porn

    You'll be pleased to know that I neither have nor plan to have children ;)

  • Comment on SPS Nutrition Services's answer…
    Picture1_small

    Devin,

    I hear you - hard to believe I am perceived as a fan of chocolate milk! We have two exceptional Registered Dietitians at Seattle Public Schools - not speaking for them, only myself, I would say that sometimes I have to separate my personal opinions from my professional.

    When the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the National Medical Association and the American Dietetic Association all take formal positions in support of offering chocolate milk in schools....well, I have to give pause.

    I try to stand in the lunch line several times a week. I am quite confident that far fewer students choose milk when only white is offered.

    What I tried to frame in my response was at the very least a first step - taking a look at breakfast.

  • Comment on SPS Nutrition Services's answer…
    Picture1_small

    Syd,

    I believe our definitions are the same.

  • Comment on SPS Nutrition Services's answer…
    41633_559655263_6685_n_small

    Perhaps our definitions of salad bar are not the same. What is your definition? I define it to include the ability to select one's own components.

  • Comment on SPS Nutrition Services's answer…
    Candy_porn

    That's fantastic! I live in Kitsap, and the same is not the case here. Good to know that Seattle is progressive in this area.

  • Comment on SPS Nutrition Services's answer…
    Amy-small_small

    At my son's school, the PTA President had a confab with the principal and staff to pull chocolate milk.

    He didn't consult with the PTA and parents on purpose. When I tried this route to get it out a few years before a mom told me she'd fight me every step of the way because her "(healthy, white, middle class child) could not go 1 meal without chocolate milk."

    They now have chocolate milk on Fridays only. It only took a few days for the kids to adjust and most drink white milk.

    There are a handful who won't drink it. In my son's school these are most likely kids are getting their nutritional needs met.

    So many students "simply will not drink white milk" because they have a choice.

    I'm with Devin on this one. Here comes a nation of unhealthy kids. Super.

  • Comment on Tom Sackett's answer…
    N871065272_8115_small

    I've very deliberately lumping all sugars together. The article you link to makes it clear that the AHA has a problem with the amount of sugar Americans consume, not one particular type of sugar.

    According to the AMA, "it appears unlikely that HFCS contributes more to obesity or other conditions than sucrose".

    The reason high-fructose corn syrup is killing us is because it has made it feasible for the food industry to put sugar in everything. U.S. agricultural and trade policy makes it artificially cheap, making it the first ingredient the food industry turns to when designing products. If we subsidized cane sugar syrup instead, we'd have the same problems.

    As for your comment about halving your kid's sugar intake, the important number is her total daily intake. (Some might even argue the important number is her total daily intake of carbohydrates as a whole, not just sugars.) Supposedly, the AMA recommends a total of 12 grams per day of sugar for children. I hope I'm misreading that, because that seems unachievably low. It does suggest, however, that you're right that 24 grams of extra sugar a day is significant.

  • Comment on SPS Nutrition Services's answer…
    Picture_2_small

    What industry do half of your dietitians work for?

    I don't know of any dietician who suggests children drink chocolate milk.

    I work in an elementary school and on some days, chocolate milk is not offered. On those days, about as much white milk is taken.

    All of this fear that children will miss out on vital nutrients sounds well and good, but what's the imminent public health crisis? Calcium deficiencies or obesity? Our next generation of children aren't expected to live shorter lives than their parents because they aren't getting enough Vitamin A. It's because 13 year olds are suffering early onset diabetes.

  • Comment on Tom Sackett's answer…
    Picture_2_small

    You're comparing lactose, a natural occurring sugar in milk, to lactose + corn syrup. One's an artificial additive that has clearly been established as a cause of obesity.

    And I'd gladly have my child (any child) halving the sugar they intake twice daily. If those same kids drink non-fat milk twice a day, we're talking (via milk alone) a difference between 26 grams of sugar and 50 daily. That's 24 grams of added sugar.

    According to the American Heart Association, children should be eating 12 grams of added sugar a day.

    Source:
    http://www.examiner.com/wellness-in-wilmington/american-heart-association-provides-new-sugar-recommendations-for-adults

  • Comment on Russ Campbell, NWEBS's answer…
    Qlandav2ex_small

    I have to stand corrected after the policy has been made clear by Mr. Boutin, Director of Nutrition Services, Seattle Public Schools.
    See his answer post for details.
    Very good support for students and their work in the gardens is great to hear about.

  • Comment on SPS Nutrition Services's answer…
    Qlandav2ex_small

    Sounds great!
    This means the bounty of the students' dedicated work can be used and enjoyed right there in their daily meal program.
    Bravo!

  • Comment on SPS Nutrition Services's answer…
    Picture1_small

    Arsenic7,

    I would share that Nutrition Services is a self-supporting department – it is not funded out of the General Fund, it is supported by USDA federal reimbursements, some state funds and local revenue from parents. With few exceptions, most school districts across the country ask their food service department to breakeven and not operate at a loss and thereby become a drain on the General Fund.

    To answer your question – yes, we work to balance our budget (revenues and expenditures) and as you point out, we are careful not to go off buying expensive foods at the expense of other foods on the tray…we only have so much to spend on food – if we spend more than budgeted on one item, we’ll have to reduce what we spend on another.

    That being said – we know we need to provide the best possible nutritious lunch (and breakfast) for kids.

    We do watch for local and organic and when the price is competitive (and sometimes it is even better than conventional) – we try to make those purchases.

  • Comment on SPS Nutrition Services's answer…
    Picture_115_small

    Since organic food is not scientifically proven to be any healthier, I hope that this is not a priority over cheaper/healthier foods that promote nutrition without digging into general education funds too much.