Rev.Enant , the queen is dead, long live the king
Follow 0
Sacri_ordines_by_charism_small
Reputation: 3722

Reputation: 3722  

Q&A:
109
0
27
1715
713
0
Classifieds:
0
0

Activity

Summary Following Followers Questions Answers Comments Classifieds

About Rev.Enant

the queen is dead, long live the king

Asked the Best Question On Q-Land Ever: Megan said so: http://questionland.thestranger.com/questions/10469-film-in-die-hard-do-you-think-if-hans-gruber-had-fired-his-gun-while-falling-he

Yes, I'm (likely) older than you.
Yes, I really believe in true love.
Yes, I'm really clergy.
and
No, that one thing I wrote that one time was actually meant to be sarcasm. Sorry 'bout that.


Recent posts

  • Comment on lilmonster206's answer…
    Sacri_ordines_by_charism_small

    SLP: No, no monastery; though, I have been travelling a bit.
    LM206: awwwwww Thx
    Oz:(and yes, the haters are legion)

    But I really don't give a flyingrodentfawk about downvotes;
    and in general the overall community / content doesn't actually suffer from downvotes. Upvotes outnumber downs by, what; 10-to-1? 30-to-1? Those who moan loudest against downvotage are totally just nursing their butthurt/perfectionism/bruised-optimism. fawk em. Skullfawk 'em all and their whiny pouting. The more they moaned, they more I always downvoted them actually. Bitching and moaning "is NOT a good answer". hehe

    IMHO downvotes are like craigslist flagging: everyone's got their own reason for it (and to each, their reason is good) and if one thinks in logic terms; downvotage is just as good/valid/arbitrary as upvotage.

    ok adios. My stagecoach is turning into a pumpkin. Back to the shadows with me. Merry xmas to all, and to all a good night.
    *poof*

    Rev.Enant commented about 1 month ago
  • Comment on Fnarf's answer…
    Sacri_ordines_by_charism_small

    Ahhh thankfawkingbabyjeezus; finally!

    Merry Xmas, fnarf! The crown's on you once more.
    Enjoy your reign as Mushroom King!

    http://www.thinkhigherthoughts.com/product/mushroom-king

    http://www.creaturespot.com/main/2009/5/25/alice-finds-the-mushroom-king.html

    Rev.Enant commented about 1 month ago
  • Follow 1
    How long do you plan to go without answering another ?, for fear that you'll hit the 100 shroom mark? Yes, I do understand the irony of this question.
    Sacri_ordines_by_charism_small

    It's not a matter of how long - it's a matter of simply not answering any more, LMNOP. And no more asking Q's or commenting either. I'm spent.

     Instead, I think I'll punch the timeclock, bid y'all a fond fareyewell, and mosey along.

    fwiw: 100 has indeed been hit (not a new A, but via an old Q finally being shroomed long after).

    Oh well: That's my final cue, I suppose. Goodbye!

     

    'it was ..fun.  oh my..'

     

    Rev.Enant answered in Whatever about 1 year ago
    Answer and comment »
  • Comment on Rev.Enant's answer…
    Sacri_ordines_by_charism_small

    Oh for fawks sake...

    a shroom a month later? thxbutnothx

    *sigh*
    Well, that's my cue...

    Rev.Enant commented about 1 year ago
  • Comment on Fnarf's answer…
    Sacri_ordines_by_charism_small

    As fnarf said, folks who have limits tend not to put their fullnames/addresses out there. Others, you might notice, have links to their personal webpages when you click on their avatars. It's a mix.
    Besides: As long as your Q is self-referential, your limit is going to be entirely up to your own comfort or tolerance.
    It's a respectful community with only occasional flareups: You might notice that trolling and flaming aren't tolerated long here, (and spam isn't tolerated at all). IMO, it's the answers that really push limits: There have been some stark-naked and raw soul-barings here. See the "how do you feel about the first time you had sex?" Q for some great examples

    Anon: As far as better off talking to a friend/therapist: sure, that's occasionally true. But I've found for years that the folks that need to talk the most (like homeless folks, and teenagers) are often the quiet ones who'll only talk if 'masked' - so this forum is near perfect for their purposes.

    Rev.Enant commented about 1 year ago
  • Comment on NGC1275's answer…
    Sacri_ordines_by_charism_small

    Could be that we're kind of grammar Nazis here...

    Papers, please.

    Rev.Enant commented about 1 year ago
  • Gogogophers_small
    Follow 1

    How long do you plan to go without answering another ?, for fear that you'll hit the 100 shroom mark? Yes, I do understand the irony of this question.

    LMNOP asked Rev.Enant in Whatever about 1 year ago
    1 Answer by Rev.Enant…
  • Comment on Basil's answer…
    Sacri_ordines_by_charism_small

    yup, they both sound like festering little sex addicts... Either they need an open marriage or they need to get in separate corners..of the nation.
    Poor kids - I hope they aren't terribly young.

    Rev.Enant commented about 1 year ago
  • Comment on LMNOP's answer…
    Sacri_ordines_by_charism_small

    I pity this fool's kids.

    Rev.Enant commented about 1 year ago
  • Comment on Rev.Enant's answer…
    Sacri_ordines_by_charism_small

    No, no you don't. Please: no more dovetailing.

    But
    Yeah, IMO: PJ & pals, and by extension, RSCM, actually AIDED in helping a scumbag walk by being witnesses --yet not doing anything to get the guy charged/help/jailed-- - ANY other citizen would have helped the law get served by simply giving their name.
    That's not exactly a welcome addition to the seattle crime/justice scene and the bottom line is:
    I hope it can change.

    p.s. with both RCSM and RLSH- These aren't "superheroes" at all - citizens patrols ala crimewatch (but with costumes) at best.
    IMO: Qpatrol were bigger 'heroes' and Seattle's Conan the Barbarian was more 'super'.

    It's closing time. It's been fun bouncing ideas back and forth - thanks. I'm turning off the tap now. Say goodnight Gracie.

    Rev.Enant commented about 1 year ago
  • See all of my 163 Questions , 1701 Answers and 1436 Comments